Drogan's Encyclopedia - We Ain't Wikipedia
Katherine Clare Timpf is proof that working at Fox News does not guarantee that you are an expert in politics, history or government. Her usual shtick involves her talking about the times she got too drunk and passed out at parties necessitating the procurement of transportation. This is fine for a few laughs, mostly at her expense, on the Gutfeld! show, but is typically considered obnoxious when conversing with Brett Baier.
Some refer to Timpf as a political expert. However, any expertise Timpf may otherwise have concerning politics and government appear to be minimal at best. It is inconceivable that anyone who involves themselves in the political arena would make a statement as boldfully ignorant as the one made by Timpf just before the 2020 election.
"It’s funny seeing people so wound up about who the president is going to be as if that makes even the slightest bit of difference."
Please note that some have defended Timpf's remark saying she wrote it while she was on her normal, nightly alcohol bender. However, it should be noted that she makes similar remarks while writing for the National Review magazine when she is, presumptively, sober.
National Review was formerly a magazine that expressed conservative thought and philosophy and it sought to defend these values. As of about 2015, it has become a mostly anti-Trump periodical. Timpf has been known to pen a few articles that are considered mostly-comprehensible by the majority of serious connoisseurs of conservative literature. However, Timpf, like most "libertarians" (and atheists), loves to point out their beliefs to anyone to has an ear. It is confusing to some as to why Timpf writes for a magazine that considers itself conservative, but since National Review has become indistinguishable from the Lincoln Project (sans scandals), it is perfectly understandable to many.
There are some who blame Timpf for the total circulation of National Review dropping below that of Pro Wrestling Illustrated. However, there are others who claim that National Review's failure to pack in 5 cents of value into a single issue is more to blame.